Quantcast
Channel: Cemetech
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 75345

General Open Topic :: RE: Photography

$
0
0
Author: comicIDIOT
Posted: 26 Dec 2012 01:04:43 am (GMT -5)

allynfolksjr wrote:
Flickr Pro is so stupid cheap compared to equipment, I don't see any reason why not to get it. Especially when factored in with the awesome Lightroom integration, it's very effective in pushing out photos.


I noticed, but Flickr Pro won't help take better photos while a FF Camera will help my 50mm 1.4 or obtaining some L glass - I really want the 2.8 and preferably IS but I'll see how fast I can save for one after vacation if I spend everything I have saved for vacation. Even though, $45 for two years is a steal. Might just do it anyway, for now I've got the free 3 months.

Quote:
The WB in " Canon 24-105mm f/4L USM" is kinda off, but I'm not sure if that's an artistic choice. Otherwise, I like it.


Indeed it was a choice. When I white balanced it in post (off the whip cream) it looked pretty terrible. I'm sure if I had taken it at night it would have looked pretty decent but the overcast blues from outside the sliding door in front of me show quite noticeably off my shirt and forehead. So I white balanced it off a dull highlight on my forehead then added some warmth in the temperature to make it look like it was shot at night with lights on in the room. Not the best execution but it's passable.

I also totally forgot Lightroom had Flickr integration. I've only been using the Facebook integration. I'll have to set that up!
_________________


-Alex


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 75345

Trending Articles