Author: KermMartian
Posted: 20 Feb 2013 12:14:43 am (GMT -5)
That screenshot is about 25% slower than a real calculator.
Slower than the black-and-white drawing on the TI-83+/TI-84+, faster than the Prizm.
Square and cross Pt-On(s don't get their colors until the program ends indeed; quite annoying. I am collecting a list of bugs to report; so far I have the Pt bug and the Menu( bug I discovered. I'll keep my eye out for other things community members find.
Anything else you want me to test, DJ_O, especially on the BASIC side of things?
_________________
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Posted: 20 Feb 2013 12:14:43 am (GMT -5)
| DJ_O wrote: |
| Does that animated screenshot runs at the exact same speed as the real calculator? If not, then how different is the speed from the calc? |
| Quote: |
| The drawing commands seems kinda slow, according to the screenshot, but they definitively seems faster than the PRIZM. |
| Quote: |
| As for the Pt-On bug, is it about all colors displaying as black until the program is stopped? If so, I hope that they fix it faster than Casio did. Casio PRIZM calcs had the exact same bug with the Locate/Output command and it took them over a year before finally fixing it >.< |
Anything else you want me to test, DJ_O, especially on the BASIC side of things?
_________________
