Author: DJ_O
Posted: 17 Feb 2013 07:12:33 pm (GMT -5)
Actually I just tried Omni attachments and they work:
![]()
http://www.omnimaga.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3611.0;attach=14587;image
Back on topic, has anyone done some tests on how fast the drawing commands are compared to the TI-83 Plus and TI-84 Plus? From a picture on TI-Planet, "For(Z,1,999:Disp Z:End" seemed 4 times slower on the color model, but a few months ago, Vijfhoek reported 1.5 times slower speed for certain commands like Pixel/Lines and I think I read once that graphing speed was almost on-par with the 84+.
Could it have been that Disp just requires a lot more LCD updates due to scrolling everything up?
_________________
Retired 83+ coder, Omnimaga/TIMGUL founder. Now doing power metal music (formerly did electronica)
![]()
Follow me on Bandcamp|Facebook|Reverbnation|Youtube|Twitter
Posted: 17 Feb 2013 07:12:33 pm (GMT -5)
Actually I just tried Omni attachments and they work:
http://www.omnimaga.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3611.0;attach=14587;image
Back on topic, has anyone done some tests on how fast the drawing commands are compared to the TI-83 Plus and TI-84 Plus? From a picture on TI-Planet, "For(Z,1,999:Disp Z:End" seemed 4 times slower on the color model, but a few months ago, Vijfhoek reported 1.5 times slower speed for certain commands like Pixel/Lines and I think I read once that graphing speed was almost on-par with the 84+.
Could it have been that Disp just requires a lot more LCD updates due to scrolling everything up?
_________________
Retired 83+ coder, Omnimaga/TIMGUL founder. Now doing power metal music (formerly did electronica)
Follow me on Bandcamp|Facebook|Reverbnation|Youtube|Twitter