Author: KermMartian
Posted: 09 Jan 2013 11:43:38 pm (GMT -5)
We tried the token overloading and it wasn't feasible, remember? We're going to stick with more sum() commands. It seems to me that in our last discussion we were considering both strings (which could be manipulated with Celtic III's commands) and lists (which are easier for BASIC coders to manipulate, but 2.5KB for a 255-byte frame including its header.
_________________
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Posted: 09 Jan 2013 11:43:38 pm (GMT -5)
We tried the token overloading and it wasn't feasible, remember? We're going to stick with more sum() commands. It seems to me that in our last discussion we were considering both strings (which could be manipulated with Celtic III's commands) and lists (which are easier for BASIC coders to manipulate, but 2.5KB for a 255-byte frame including its header.
_________________
